Suppressing climate research

The cosmic ray cloud formation correlation has been suspected for sometime, if these reports of trying to suppress confirmation of parts of the experiments looking into this are true that will be big news. Not surprising in that obviously CO2 has risen over the past decade and temperatures have not. And the revelation that scientists used only part of tree ring data to manufacture the "hockeystick" graph shows we are well past science and into the realms of religion with some climate research.

Weird request here to not interpret experiment results.

CERN Director General Rolf-Dieter Heuer told Welt Online that the scientists should refrain from drawing conclusions from the latest experiment.

“I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them,” reports veteran science editor Nigel Calder on his blog. Why?

Consensus, forbidden, hidden data, destroyed data source information, plenty of words to start to fear the warmist propagandists.

The CERN experiment is supposed to be the big test of the Svensmark theory. It’s a tipoff, then, that CERN’s boss, Rolf-Dieter Heuer, has just told the German magazine Die Welt that he has forbidden his researchers to “interpret” the forthcoming test results. In other words, the CERN report will be a stark “just the facts” listing of the findings. Those findings must support Svensmark, or Heuer would never have issued such a stifling order on a major experiment.

See here for more information.

One of six widows on the cloud mystery, about an hour long and well worth watching.

The world has sen many ice ages, so we better understand the real natural effects on climate as well as how much we influence climate before we attempt to do anything about it.

And one other link that has an interesting graph on it. which looks like there is a correlation with cosmic rays and global temperatures.